Financial System Infrastructure in Brazil Porter's Six Forces Analysis¶
The Brazilian Financial System Infrastructure (FSI) operates within a dynamic environment shaped by several competitive and external forces. Applying Porter's Six Forces framework, adapted to include the significant role of regulation in the financial sector, reveals the key structural characteristics influencing competition and profitability within this value chain.
Threat of New Entrants¶
The threat of new entrants in the Brazilian FSI is moderate to high, varying significantly across different stages of the value chain. While core infrastructure layers like exchange operations (B3's quasi-monopoly) and large-value settlement (BCB's systems) present very high barriers to entry due to substantial capital requirements, network effects, and stringent regulatory licensing. However, in other segments, the threat is increasing.
Fintechs and "infratech" players are actively entering areas like payments processing, registry, and technology provision. Initiatives like Pix and Open Finance, driven by the regulator (BCB), explicitly aim to lower entry barriers and stimulate competition by providing open access and interoperability standards. New registrars (CERC, TAG, CRDC, SPC Grafeno) have emerged, intensifying competition in that specific segment. Payment institutions (acquirers, issuers, payment facilitators) have also seen increased entry, challenging the dominance of traditional players like Cielo and Rede.
Nonetheless, significant hurdles remain, including the need for robust technology infrastructure, compliance with complex and evolving regulations (Cost of Compliance), access to critical networks and existing participants, and the challenge of building trust and scale in a market historically dominated by large incumbents. Legacy core systems within some established players can also act as a barrier for potential entrants needing to integrate.
Bargaining Power of Suppliers¶
The bargaining power of suppliers in the Brazilian FSI is moderate to high, largely concentrated among providers of critical technology, data, and specialized services. Key suppliers include technology companies providing core banking systems, cloud computing services (AWS, Azure, GCP, Oracle), cybersecurity solutions, and data analytics platforms.
The reliance of financial institutions and IMFs on these specialized technology vendors for core systems and innovation gives these suppliers notable influence. Cloud providers, in particular, have increasing power as migration to the cloud accelerates. Data providers supplying market data, risk data, and analytical tools also hold some bargaining power, especially for sophisticated risk management and trading activities.
However, the market for technology and data services is not monolithic, with multiple domestic (TOTVS, Matera, Dock, QI Tech, Grafeno) and international players (AWS, Microsoft, Google Cloud, Oracle FSS) competing. This competition can mitigate the suppliers' power to some extent. Additionally, larger financial institutions often have in-house technology capabilities or long-term contracts that may reduce supplier leverage.
Bargaining Power of Customers¶
The bargaining power of customers in the Brazilian FSI varies depending on the customer segment and the specific service. Large financial institutions (universal banks) are significant customers of core infrastructure providers (B3, Nuclea, BCB systems, registrars). Their size, volume of transactions, and direct participation in various IMFs give them considerable bargaining power in negotiating fees and service levels. The concentration of assets under custody among a few large custodians (Top-4 custodians hold 68.4 % of assets) also suggests that large asset owners may have some leverage.
However, for essential, often monopolistic or highly concentrated infrastructure services like exchange trading (B3) or core payment systems (BCB), the individual bargaining power of participants is limited, as they are dependent on these systems to operate.
Retail customers have gained significant power in payments due to the introduction of Pix and the rise of digital banks and fintechs, leading to increased competition and lower costs for end-users. Merchants, particularly smaller ones, have historically faced significant costs from card acquirers, but the increased competition in the acquiring market (Cielo, Rede, Stone) and the rise of Pix are increasing their bargaining power.
Threat of Substitute Products or Services¶
The threat of substitute products or services in the Brazilian FSI is present, particularly in certain segments, driven by technological advancements and evolving user preferences.
In payments, while traditional methods like TED and boleto still hold value share, Pix has emerged as a significant substitute for various payment types due to its instantaneity and lower cost. Direct peer-to-peer (P2P) transfers via digital platforms can substitute for traditional bank transfers.
In capital markets, alternative funding sources (e.g., crowdfunding, direct lending) could potentially substitute for traditional debt or equity issuance for some entities. The increasing tokenization of assets and the potential for DLT-based platforms (like DREX) could offer alternative ways to issue, trade, and settle financial instruments outside traditional infrastructure, posing a long-term substitute threat.
However, for core functions like clearing, settlement, and centralized custody of traditional securities, direct substitutes are limited due to the critical need for regulatory compliance, systemic stability, and robust risk management, which is currently best provided by established IMFs.
Rivalry Among Existing Competitors¶
Rivalry among existing competitors in the Brazilian FSI is intense in some segments and more limited in others.
Competition is particularly fierce in payments processing, especially in the acquiring and digital wallet spaces, with numerous players (Cielo, Rede, Stone, PagSeguro, Mercado Pago, Nubank) vying for market share, leading to pressure on fees like the Merchant Discount Rate (MDR). The introduction of Pix further intensified this rivalry. The digital banking sector (Nubank, Inter, etc.) is highly competitive, impacting traditional banks' market share in customer accounts and basic financial services.
In the registry segment, the entry of new players (CERC, TAG, CRDC, SPC Grafeno) is increasing rivalry with the historically dominant Nuclea.
However, in core infrastructure areas like exchange and listed market clearing, B3 operates as a quasi-monopoly, limiting direct rivalry. While there are other players in OTC markets and some clearing/settlement functions (Nuclea, Selic), B3's integrated model gives it a dominant position. Custody also shows significant concentration among a few large banks and B3 CSD.
Overall, while certain segments are highly competitive due to fintech disruption and regulatory pushes for open access, key infrastructure components still exhibit high levels of concentration, limiting overall rivalry in those specific areas.
Influence of Regulation and Supervision¶
The influence of regulation and supervision (BCB, CVM, CMN) is exceptionally high and pervasive across the entire Brazilian FSI value chain. Regulatory bodies set the rules, license participants, oversee operations, and enforce compliance, fundamentally shaping the market structure and competitive landscape.
The BCB's role in operating core payment and settlement systems (STR, SPI/Pix, Selic) gives it direct influence over crucial infrastructure. Regulatory initiatives like Pix and Open Finance are explicit drivers of change, fostering innovation and competition by mandating interoperability and data sharing. The regulatory framework for registrars has created a new competitive segment.
Compliance with regulations (e.g., Basel III, LGPD, cybersecurity mandates) imposes significant costs on all participants, influencing business models and creating a barrier for smaller players (Cost of Compliance). Regulators also play a critical role in managing systemic risk and ensuring financial stability.
The rapidly evolving regulatory landscape, including discussions around DLT, crypto-assets, and further phases of Open Finance, constantly shapes the strategic priorities and investment flows within the FSI. The direct involvement of the regulator in driving infrastructure development and market structure (e.g., DREX pilot) makes the influence of regulation a dominant force.
References¶
ANBIMA: Brasil tem R$ 9 trilhões em ativos custodiados. https://www.anbima.com.br/pt_br/noticias/brasil-tem-r-9-trilhoes-em-ativos-custodiados.html Banco Central do Brasil: Infraestruturas do mercado financeiro. https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/infraestruturasmercado Banco Central do Brasil: Sistema de Pagamentos Brasileiro (SPB). https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/sistemadepagamentosbrasileiro Banco Central do Brasil: Sistema Especial de Liquidação e de Custódia (Selic). https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/selic Banco Central do Brasil: BC passa a disponibilizar as Estatísticas de Pagamentos de Varejo e de Cartões no Brasil em seu Portal de Dados Abertos. https://www.bcb.gov.br/detalhenoticia/13233/TextoFCom CERC: Infraestruturas do Mercado Financeiro (IMF). https://cerc.inf.br/sobre-imf/ CRDC: Registradoras de Recebíveis – O Que São e Como Impactam Seu Negócio. https://crdc.com.br/blog/registradoras-de-recebiveis-o-que-sao-e-como-impactam-seu-negocio/ EY Brasil: Gestão de riscos em serviços financeiros. https://www.ey.com/pt_br/financial-services/risk-management Planalto: L4595 - Lei nº 4.595 de 31 de Dezembro de 1964. https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l4595.htm Destrava Aí: Conheça 5 registradoras de recebíveis autorizadas pelo Banco Central. https://blog.destrava.ai/registradoras-de-recebiveis/ Instituto Propague: Pix eleva movimentacao via iniciacao de pagamento a nivel recorde. https://institutopropague.org/noticias/pix-eleva-movimentacao-via-iniciacao-de-pagamento-a-nivel-recorde/ IT Forum: Tendências de tecnologia para o mercado financeiro. https://itforum.com.br/tendencias-de-tecnologia-para-o-mercado-financeiro/ JOTA: Os 9 anos do marco legal e regulatorio de registradoras e depositarios centrais. https://www.jota.info/opiniao-e-analise/artigos/os-9-anos-do-marco-legal-e-regulatorio-de-registradoras-e-depositarios-centrais-08062022 Conjur: Infraestruturas de mercado financeiro: invisiveis, mas essenciais. https://www.conjur.com.br/2024-jul-10/infraestruturas-de-mercado-financeiro-invisiveis-mas-essenciais/ Banco Central do Brasil: Supervisão do Sistema Financeiro. https://www.bcb.gov.br/estabilidadefinanceira/supervisao FEBRABAN Notícias: Pix é o meio de pagamento mais usado no Brasil em 2023; TED lidera em valores transacionados. https://quantoplan.febraban.org.br/noticias/pix-e-o-meio-de-pagamento-mais-usado-no-brasil-em-2023-ted-lidera-em-valores-transacionados Finsiders Brasil: Quantidade de pagamentos digitais cresce 31% no primeiro semestre. https://www.finsiders.com.br/noticias/pagamentos/quantidade-de-pagamentos-digitais-cresce-31-no-primeiro-semestre-do-ano/ Estudo market share de bancos: em 5 anos, bancos tradicionais tem queda de 57%. https://materiais.idwall.com/market-share-bancos Nuclea RI: Núclea, antiga CIP, entra para associação da criptoeconomia. https://ri.nuclea.com.br/noticias/nuclea-antiga-cip-entra-para-associacao-da-criptoeconomia/ ANBIMA Data: Volume emitido de incentivadas supera em 65% o total de 2023. https://data.anbima.com.br/debentures/volume-emitido-debentures-incentivadas-supera-2023 Money Times: B3 (B3SA3): Volume financeiro médio diário cresce 4,1% em abril, para R$ 25,6 bilhões. https://www.moneytimes.com.br/b3-b3sa3-volume-financeiro-medio-diario-cresce-41-em-abril-para-r-256-bilhoes/ Mais Retorno: Tesouro escolhe Trademate, da B3, como plataforma para negociação de títulos públicos. https://conteudos.maisretorno.com.br/noticias/tesouro-escolhe-trademate-da-b3-como-plataforma-para-negociacao-de-titulos-publicos Dock: Pagamentos instantâneos: principais sistemas na LatAm e no mundo, desafios e potencial de inclusão financeira. https://www.dock.tech/blog/pagamentos-instantaneos-principais-sistemas/ Amcham Brasil: Custo Brasil: o que e e como afeta as empresas. https://www.amchambrasil.com.br/upload/publicacoes/Custo_Brasil.pdf Dimensa: Tecnologia Bancaria: Desafios Na Adocao E Principais Tecnologias Usadas. https://dimensa.com/blog/tecnologia-bancaria/ BIP Brasil: Gestao de Riscos. https://www.bipbrasil.com.br/gestao-de-riscos/ Uplexis: Entenda o que sao e como fazer a gestao dos riscos financeiros. https://www.uplexis.com.br/blog/gestao-de-riscos-financeiros/ QI Tech: Infraestrutura financeira: o que e, vantagens e tendencias. https://blog.qitech.app/infraestrutura-financeira-o-que-e/ Dock: Infratech financeira: como a estrutura tecnologica pode transformar e otimizar os servicos financeiros. https://www.dock.tech/blog/infratech-financeira/ Matera: SPB: o que voce precisa saber sobre o Sistema de Pagamentos Brasileiro. https://blog.matera.com/sistema-de-pagamentos-brasileiro-spb/ IT Forum: Tendencias de tecnologia para o mercado financeiro. https://itforum.com.br/tendencias-de-tecnologia-para-o-mercado-financeiro/ Finsiders Brasil: BC aprova nova registradora SPC Grafeno; Adyen e Zapay sao autorizadas como IP. https://www.finsiders.com.br/noticias/regulacao/bc-aprova-nova-registradora-spc-grafeno-adyen-e-zapay-sao-autorizadas-como-ip/ InfinitePay: O que sao as Registradoras de Recebiveis?. https://ajuda.infinitepay.io/pt-br/articles/6517177-o-que-sao-as-registradoras-de-recebiveis Finsiders Brasil: Crescem as plataformas de infraestrutura para servicos financeiros. https://www.finsiders.com.br/noticias/fintechs/crescem-as-plataformas-de-infraestrutura-para-servicos-financeiros/ Transfeera: Interoperabilidade: quais os tipos e como funciona no setor financeiro?. https://blog.transfeera.com/interoperabilidade/ Instituto Propague: Open Finance brasileiro integra projeto global de interoperabilidade. https://institutopropague.org/noticias/open-finance-brasileiro-integra-projeto-global-de-interoperabilidade/ Lefosse: Open Finance: o que muda com interoperabilidade no sistema?. https://www.lefosse.com/news-insights/open-finance-o-que-muda-com-interoperabilidade-no-sistema/ BNP Paribas Brazil: Securities Services. https://group.bnpparibas/br/sobre-n%C3%B3s/securities-services