Skip to content

Payment in Argentina Porter's Six Forces Analysis

Detailed report on the six forces of Porter applied to the Payment value chain.

Threat of New Entrants

The threat of new entrants in the Argentinian payment industry is moderate to high, influenced by several countervailing factors identified in the value chain analysis. On one hand, regulatory initiatives by the BCRA, such as Transferencias 3.0 and the push for QR code interoperability, have lowered some barriers to entry, particularly for fintechs and PSPs. These policies aim to foster competition and allow new players to connect to the core payment infrastructure more easily. The exponential growth of e-commerce and the increasing adoption of digital wallets also present opportunities for new entrants targeting specific niches or offering innovative solutions. Fintechs like Mercado Pago and Ualá have demonstrated successful market entry and growth, challenging traditional players.

However, significant barriers persist. The initial investment required for building robust, secure, and scalable technology infrastructure remains substantial. [Value Chain Analysis] Establishing widespread acceptance networks (POS terminals, online gateways) can be costly and time-consuming, as evidenced by the existing large installed base of over 1.6 million active POS devices. [Value Chain Analysis] Navigating Argentina's complex and evolving regulatory landscape, including licensing requirements and frequent policy changes (e.g., BCRA Com. “A” 7769), poses a significant challenge and potential deterrent for new players, particularly foreign investors. [Value Chain Analysis] Access to funding, especially with high local interest rates and a decline in VC funding in 2024, can also constrain the ability of startups to scale. [Value Chain Analysis] Historical market concentration in segments like processing and acquiring, although being addressed by regulators, still implies established players benefit from economies of scale and network effects, making it harder for new entrants to gain significant traction quickly. [Value Chain Analysis] Building trust and brand recognition among both consumers and merchants in a market transitioning from cash is also a non-trivial barrier.

Overall, while regulatory tailwinds and digitalization create openings for new entrants, infrastructure costs, regulatory hurdles, funding constraints, and existing market concentration temper the ease of entry.

Bargaining Power of Buyers

The bargaining power of buyers in the Argentinian payment industry can be analyzed from the perspective of both consumers and merchants.

Consumers: Consumers' bargaining power has increased due to the growing availability of diverse electronic payment methods, including cards (credit, debit, prepaid), digital wallets (Mercado Pago, Ualá, Modo), and immediate A2A transfers via Transferencias 3.0. The interoperability driven by the BCRA's agenda means consumers have more choices at the point of sale or online, reducing reliance on a single provider or instrument. The competitive landscape, particularly among digital wallets and fintechs, can lead to pressure on fees or the offering of value-added services to attract users. However, consumer power is somewhat limited by factors like potential switching costs (e.g., moving funds between accounts, getting new cards) and the varying acceptance levels of different payment methods across all merchant categories, especially in informal sectors or rural areas where cash remains dominant. [Value Chain Analysis] High inflation also erodes the value of money, potentially increasing consumer preference for digital methods that allow faster transactions and potentially access to investment features (like those offered by Mercado Pago). [Value Chain Analysis]

Merchants: Merchants' bargaining power is mixed and depends heavily on their size and transaction volume. Large merchants with high transaction volumes typically have greater power to negotiate lower Merchant Discount Rates (MDRs) with acquirers and PSPs. [Value Chain Analysis] The increased competition in the acquiring space with players like Getnet challenging historical dominance (Prisma/Fiserv) is beneficial for merchants. [Value Chain Analysis] The lower costs associated with accepting A2A QR payments compared to card payments (MDR average 2.2%–3.5% for cards vs. <0.8% for A2A QR) provide merchants with an incentive and some leverage to push for lower overall acceptance costs. [Value Chain Analysis] However, small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), particularly those in less urbanized or informal sectors, have lower bargaining power. They may face higher per-transaction costs and have fewer options for payment acceptance solutions due to infrastructure gaps or limited digital literacy. [Value Chain Analysis] Switching costs between acquirers can also limit merchant power. [Value Chain Analysis] The necessity of accepting popular payment methods (like cards and dominant digital wallets) to avoid losing customers also limits merchant power in setting terms.

In summary, the increase in digital payment options and regulatory pushes for interoperability have generally increased buyer power, particularly for consumers and larger merchants, while SMEs and those in underserved areas still face limitations.

Bargaining Power of Suppliers

The bargaining power of suppliers in the Argentinian payment industry is significant, largely residing with technology providers, network operators (schemes), and processors.

Technology and Infrastructure Providers: Companies providing core banking software, payment processing platforms, hardware (POS terminals), and network connectivity hold considerable power. Switching costs for financial institutions, acquirers, and processors are high once their systems are integrated with a specific technology provider. [Value Chain Analysis] The specialized nature of payment technology and the need for high reliability and security limit the number of qualified providers, giving existing ones leverage in pricing and contract terms. Players like Verifone and Ingenico (hardware), and companies providing core processing software are critical suppliers. [Value Chain Analysis]

Scheme Managers and Network Operators: Visa, Mastercard, Cabal, and the administrators of the Transferencias 3.0 hub (like COELSA, Interbanking, Red Link) hold substantial power. [Value Chain Analysis] They own and operate the essential infrastructure and set the rules (including interchange fees and assessment fees) that govern transactions on their networks. [Value Chain Analysis] Financial institutions (issuers and acquirers) rely heavily on access to these networks to offer widely accepted payment methods. While the BCRA regulates interchange fees to some extent, the schemes still dictate technical standards and operational rules, creating dependence among participants. [Value Chain Analysis] The dominance of Visa and Mastercard in card purchase volume further illustrates their power. [Value Chain Analysis]

Processors: While regulatory efforts have aimed to reduce historical concentration, major processors like Prisma and Fiserv still handle a significant majority of domestic card switching. [Value Chain Analysis] The complexity and mission-critical nature of payment processing infrastructure mean that switching processors is a complex and costly undertaking for banks and acquirers, granting processors considerable bargaining power in their service level agreements and per-transaction fees. [Value Chain Analysis]

Overall, the specialized technology, high switching costs, and critical nature of the services provided by these suppliers contribute to their strong bargaining power within the Argentinian payment value chain.

Threat of Substitute Products or Services

The primary substitute for electronic payments in Argentina remains cash. Despite rapid digitalization, cash still accounts for approximately 36% of retail spend, particularly prevalent in the informal economy and certain geographic areas where digital infrastructure is lacking. [Value Chain Analysis] The high level of informality in the economy directly contributes to the persistent use of cash as a substitute, as it allows transactions to occur outside the formal, taxable system. [Value Chain Analysis] Barter could also be considered a very limited substitute, though not a significant threat to the formal payment system's scale.

While other forms of value exchange exist (like store credit or loyalty points within closed-loop systems), they are generally not direct substitutes for broad payment methods used across different merchants. Emerging technologies like cryptocurrencies could theoretically act as substitutes, but their volatility, regulatory uncertainty, and limited acceptance currently restrict their widespread use as a direct substitute for day-to-day transactions within the mainstream economy compared to cash or established electronic methods. Mercado Pago's offering of crypto is noted, but it's not presented as a primary payment method substitute in the provided analysis.

The threat of cash as a substitute is significant because it bypasses the entire electronic payment value chain, impacting the transaction volumes and revenue streams of all players (issuers, acquirers, schemes, processors, etc.). Reducing the informality and expanding digital infrastructure and financial literacy are key to mitigating this threat. [Value Chain Analysis]

Intensity of Rivalry

The intensity of rivalry in the Argentinian payment industry is high and increasing, driven by regulatory changes, technological advancements, and the entry of new players.

Historically, certain segments, like acquiring and processing, were characterized by high concentration and limited rivalry (e.g., Prisma's historical dominance). [Value Chain Analysis] However, regulatory actions, such as the divestment requirements for Prisma and the promotion of interoperability, have actively aimed to increase competition. [Value Chain Analysis] The entry and rapid growth of fintechs like Mercado Pago and Ualá, particularly in the digital wallet and QR payment space, have introduced significant new rivalry, challenging the traditional dominance of banks and established players. These fintechs compete fiercely on user experience, convenience, and merchant acceptance, especially among SMEs. [Value Chain Analysis]

Competition in the acquiring market has also intensified with players like Getnet gaining market share, pushing traditional acquirers like Prisma/Payway and Fiserv/FirstData to innovate with solutions like softPOS and Tap-to-Phone. [Value Chain Analysis] While Visa and Mastercard still dominate the card network space, domestic schemes and the Transferencias 3.0 framework introduce elements of local competition and interoperability requirements that influence how the global schemes operate within Argentina. [Value Chain Analysis]

Rivalry is observed in pricing (MDRs, fees), product innovation (new features in digital wallets, BNPL options), and the race to expand acceptance networks. The high growth rates in immediate transfers and QR payments indicate a dynamic market where players are actively competing for transaction volume. [Value Chain Analysis] However, macroeconomic instability and policy volatility can sometimes shift focus from pure market competition to navigating the challenging operating environment. [Value Chain Analysis]

Overall, the industry is moving towards a more competitive landscape, particularly in the consumer-facing and merchant acceptance segments, while some infrastructure layers still exhibit higher concentration, leading to varied intensity of rivalry across the value chain.

Influence of Other Stakeholders

The Argentinian payment industry is heavily influenced by several key stakeholders beyond the direct players in the value chain:

Regulatory Bodies (BCRA, CNDC, Secretaría de Comercio): The Central Bank (BCRA) is arguably the most influential stakeholder. It sets monetary policy, regulates financial institutions and PSPs, operates the critical MEP settlement system, and has been the primary driver of major payment system reforms like Transferencias 3.0 and QR interoperability. [Value Chain Analysis] The BCRA's regulations dictate everything from licensing and capital requirements to technical standards, interchange fees, and anti-money laundering (AML)/know your customer (KYC) compliance, profoundly impacting the operations and business models of all participants. [Value Chain Analysis] The National Commission for the Defense of Competition (CNDC) and the Secretariat of Commerce also play roles in promoting competition and consumer protection within the industry. [Value Chain Analysis] The influence of regulators is significant, and policy volatility is identified as a major challenge. [Value Chain Analysis]

Consumers: While also considered 'buyers,' consumers as a collective have influence through their adoption patterns and preferences. The rapid uptake of digital wallets and QR payments demonstrates their power to drive market trends and push providers to offer convenient and accessible solutions. [Value Chain Analysis] Consumer trust (or lack thereof, especially regarding security and fraud) can significantly impact the adoption of electronic payments. [Value Chain Analysis]

Merchants: Similar to consumers, merchants as a group influence the market through their willingness to adopt specific payment methods and their feedback on costs and services. Their need for efficient and affordable payment acceptance is a key driver for competition in the acquiring and PSP segments. [Value Chain Analysis]

International Card Networks (Visa, Mastercard): Although analyzed as scheme managers, their global influence as major international networks sets de facto standards and connects the Argentinian market to the global payment ecosystem. Their rules and fee structures, even when subject to local regulation, are powerful external forces. [Value Chain Analysis]

Technology Standards Bodies: Organizations that develop global payment standards (like ISO 8583, ISO 20022) influence the technical infrastructure and interoperability requirements within Argentina's payment system. [Value Chain Analysis]

Macroeconomic Environment (Inflation, Policy Volatility): High inflation and broader economic policy volatility are significant external forces that directly impact the operating environment, pricing, investment decisions, and risk profiles of all players in the value chain. [Value Chain Analysis] These factors create uncertainty and necessitate constant adaptation. [Value Chain Analysis]

These stakeholders, particularly regulators and the macroeconomic environment, exert substantial influence on the structure, conduct, and performance of the Argentinian payment industry, shaping the strategic priorities and challenges faced by all participants.

References

  • Banco Central de la República Argentina. Sistemas de Pago. https://www.bcra.gob.ar/SistemasDePago/Sistemas-de-pago.asp
  • Banco Central de la República Argentina. Medios de pago electrónico. https://www.bcra.gob.ar/PublicacionesEstadisticas/Medios_pago_electronico.asp
  • COELSA. Cámaras Electrónicas de Compensación. https://www.coelsa.com.ar/
  • Latam Fintech Hub. “Paytechs, los nuevos eslabones clave de la cadena de valor…” https://latamfintech.io/blog/paytechs-los-nuevos-eslabones-clave-de-la-cadena-de-valor-en-los-pagos-digitales/
  • Infobae. “Fuerte cambio en los medios de pago: las transferencias inmediatas…” https://www.infobae.com/economia/2024/12/19/fuerte-cambio-en-los-medios-de-pago-las-transferencias-inmediatas-de-dinero-aumentaron-casi-50-en-2024/
  • Americas Market Intelligence. “E-commerce en Argentina: estadísticas y datos 2023.” https://americasmi.com/es/blog/e-commerce-argentina-estadisticas/
  • rankingslatam. Mercado de Tarjetas de Crédito y Débito en Argentina. https://rankingslatam.com/mercado-tarjetas-credito-debito-argentina-rankings/
  • BOLETIN OFICIAL REPUBLICA ARGENTINA. Comunicación BCRA “A” 7769/2023. https://www.boletinoficial.gob.ar/detalleAviso/primera/287697/20230517
  • OECD. “Competencia, Fintechs y Open Banking en Argentina.” https://www.oecd.org/daf/competition/Session%20I%20Competition,%20Fintechs%20and%20Open%20Banking%20in%20Argentina.pdf
  • Visa Press Release. “Visa establece operaciones en Argentina.” https://visa.la/about-visa/newsroom/press-releases/nr-la-ar-20231121.html
  • Mordor Intelligence. Argentina Payments Market Report. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/es/industry-reports/argentina-payments-market
  • Getnet Argentina. Actividades Prohibidas. https://www.getnet.com.ar/storage/documentos/principales/getnet-actividades-prohibidas-uso.pdf
  • Marval, O'Farrell & Mairal. “Nuevas medidas de interoperabilidad para pagos con QR.” https://www.marval.com/publicacion/se-amplia-el-universo-de-proveedores-de-servicios-de-pagos-regulados-y-se-establecen-nuevas-medidas-de-interoperabilidad-para-pagos-con-qr-14832
  • BCRA. Informe de Inclusión Financiera. https://www.bcra.gob.ar/Pdfs/Comunicaciones/Informe%20de%20Inclusion%20Financiera.pdf
  • Argentina.gob.ar. pago electrónico. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/tema/economia/pago-electronico
  • Argentina.gob.ar. Competencia, Fintech. https://www.argentina.gob.ar/cncd/competencia-fintech
  • rankingslatam. Mercado de Tarjetas de Crédito y Débito en Argentina - Rankings a Diciembre de 2024. https://rankingslatam.com/mercado-tarjetas-credito-debito-argentina-rankings/
  • Infobae. Fuerte cambio en los medios de pago: las transferencias inmediatas de dinero aumentaron casi 50% en 2024. https://www.infobae.com/economia/2024/12/19/fuerte-cambio-en-los-medios-de-pago-las-transferencias-inmediatas-de-dinero-aumentaron-casi-50-en-2024/
  • Infobae. La Argentina es el país de América Latina donde más se usan las billeteras digitales para pagar en los comercios. https://www.infobae.com/tecno/2024/12/04/la-argentina-es-el-pais-de-america-latina-donde-mas-se-usan-las-billeteras-digitales-para-pagar-en-los-comercios/