Skip to content

Payment in Chile Potential Whitespaces Qualification

Whitespaces Qualification

This section qualifies the identified whitespaces in the Chilean payment industry, detailing demand and offer signals, value chain impact, ranking, key assumptions, risks, challenges, and potential solutions.

1. Unified National QR/NFC Payment Standard

  • Demand side signals:

    • Consumers desire a single, intuitive mobile payment method to avoid confusion from multiple QR codes and proprietary wallets (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis; Unmet Needs & Pains Report).
    • Merchants need seamless, standardized acceptance to reduce checkout friction and improve conversion rates (Unmet Needs & Pains Report).
    • 96% of adults hold at least one financial product, and mobile internet penetration is high (22.8 million users), indicating a population ready for ubiquitous digital payment solutions (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis; Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Demand for digital-first payment experiences is evident, with cash use at only 3% of retail transactions (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • The Fintech Law and the development of the Open Finance System (OFS) by 2027 provide the regulatory framework for PISPs to offer standardized A2A payments (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • The Central Bank and CMF are actively involved in regulatory updates and discussions around payment system modernization, including QR interoperability (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile; Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Digital wallets are the fastest-growing segment, indicating provider interest in mobile payments, though currently fragmented (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Lessons can be learned from successful national payment schemes like Brazil's Pix (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: Standardization would significantly simplify how payments are initiated across POS, e-commerce, and mobile channels, making A2A payments more accessible.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Would necessitate interoperability among existing wallet providers and acquirers, potentially through a central hub or shared standard. Merchants would benefit from a single acceptance point.
    • Infrastructure & Networks: Requires the development or enhancement of national payment infrastructure (like an expanded LBTR or a new Fast Payment System) and APIs to support the standard.
    • Regulation & Oversight: CMF and Central Bank would play a crucial role in defining, mandating, and overseeing the standard.
    • Disruptiveness: High. A truly interoperable national standard would fundamentally change the competitive landscape, reduce reliance on card networks for certain transactions, and foster innovation in PISP and wallet services.

  • Ranking: 1 (Highest market signal strength due to clear demand from both consumers and merchants, regulatory push towards Open Finance, and the success of similar initiatives internationally).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Banks and existing payment players will collaborate or be mandated to adopt the common standard.
    • Assumption: The Central Bank/CMF will actively lead or facilitate the creation and governance of the standard.
    • Assumption: PISPs under Open Finance will be able to leverage this standard for low-cost A2A payments.
    • Risk: Resistance from incumbent players with established proprietary systems or those benefiting from current interchange fee structures.
    • Risk: Delays in the full implementation and adoption of the Open Finance System (OFS).
    • Risk: Cybersecurity challenges in establishing and maintaining a secure national system.
    • Risk: Achieving widespread merchant and consumer adoption quickly enough to make the system viable.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Achieving consensus among diverse stakeholders (banks, fintechs, card networks) on technical standards and governance.
    • Integrating legacy systems with new infrastructure.
    • Ensuring robust security and fraud prevention for the new standard.
    • Educating consumers and merchants on the benefits and usage of the new system.
    • Addressing the "chicken and egg" problem of adoption (merchants won't adopt without users, users won't adopt without merchant acceptance).

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Government-led initiative (Central Bank/CMF) to define and mandate a national QR/NFC standard.
    • Development of a central interoperability hub or switch.
    • Phased rollout, potentially starting with P2P or specific use cases.
    • Incentives for early adoption by merchants and consumers.
    • Strong focus on user experience (UX) design for simplicity and ease of use.
    • Leveraging existing mobile penetration and digital wallet growth.

2. Real-Time Settlement & Transparent Pricing for SMEs

  • Demand side signals:

    • SMEs cite T+2/T+3 credit card settlement delays as a significant cash-flow pain point (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis; Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Merchants desire clear, predictable pricing and dislike hidden fees in MDR statements (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • Growing e-commerce (USD 34bn in 2023) means more merchants are reliant on digital payment flows and thus impacted by settlement times (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).

  • Offer side signals:

    • New acquirers (Getnet, EVO/Bci, Kushki) are introducing more competitive and transparent pricing models like Interchange++ (Payment in Chile Ongoing Changes Signals Analysis; Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • Some digital wallets (e.g., Mercado Pago) already offer faster, intra-wallet settlement, setting merchant expectations (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • PISPs under Open Finance are expected to offer low-cost A2A payments, which could inherently have faster settlement characteristics (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • Discussions around leveraging ComBanc's 24/7 capabilities or a new Fast Payment System for retail payments (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis; Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Clearing & Settlement: Fundamental changes required to move from batch processing to real-time or near real-time settlement for a wider range of transactions.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Acquirers and wallet providers would need to adapt their systems and commercial models to offer faster settlement and transparent pricing.
    • Processing: Processors would need to support faster data transmission and reconciliation.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium to High. Would significantly improve SME cash flow, potentially alter acquirer revenue models (reducing float income), and increase competition based on service levels beyond just MDR.

  • Ranking: 2 (Strong demand from a significant merchant segment, coupled with competitive pressures and technological enablers pushing for change).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Existing clearing infrastructure (ComBanc, LBTR) can be adapted or new systems can be built cost-effectively to support retail real-time settlement.
    • Assumption: Acquirers are willing to forego potential revenue from float to offer faster settlement as a competitive differentiator.
    • Assumption: SMEs are willing to potentially pay a small premium for instant settlement if it significantly improves cash flow.
    • Risk: Increased liquidity requirements and operational complexities for acquirers and PSPs.
    • Risk: Potential for increased fraud if settlement is too fast without robust pre-settlement checks.
    • Risk: Cost of upgrading infrastructure for all participants in the value chain.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Investment needed to upgrade existing clearing and settlement systems or build new ones.
    • Coordinating changes across multiple banks, acquirers, and processors.
    • Developing new risk management models for real-time settlement environments.
    • Communicating new pricing models clearly to merchants.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Overlay services on existing fast payment rails (e.g., expanding ComBanc's real-time capabilities or creating new retail FPS).
    • Fintech-driven payout solutions offering guaranteed same-day funding.
    • Acquirers offering tiered settlement options (e.g., standard T+2 vs. premium T+0).
    • Clearer, standardized fee statements and Interchange++ pricing adoption.
    • Use of ISO 20022 messaging standard for richer data and easier reconciliation, facilitating transparency.

3. Affordable AI-Powered Fraud Prevention for SMEs

  • Demand side signals:

    • Rising phishing, account takeover (ATO), and card-not-present (CNP) fraud are major concerns for both consumers and merchants (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • SMEs often lack access to sophisticated fraud prevention tools due to cost and complexity (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • Double-digit growth in fraud attempts reported by issuers (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Adoption of AI/ML for fraud scoring is accelerating among larger banks and gateways (Payment in Chile Ongoing Changes Signals Analysis).
    • 3-D Secure 2.0 rollout completed in 2024, providing a stronger authentication framework (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Availability of cloud-based AI/ML platforms makes developing scalable solutions more feasible.
    • Fintechs specializing in reg-tech and fraud prevention are emerging (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile - "local reg-techs").

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Authentication & Authorization: Central to implementing stronger fraud checks during the transaction process.
    • Processing: Real-time fraud scoring can be embedded within transaction processing flows.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Merchants need integrated tools; wallets need to secure user accounts.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium. While AI/ML is already used by large players, making it accessible and affordable for SMEs would be a significant improvement and could shift market share towards providers offering such solutions.

  • Ranking: 3 (High and growing demand due to increasing fraud, offer-side capabilities are developing but accessibility for SMEs is the key gap).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: AI/ML models can be trained effectively with sufficient relevant data to provide accurate fraud detection for diverse SME use cases.
    • Assumption: SMEs are willing to adopt new tools and potentially share data (within privacy regulations) to benefit from better fraud protection.
    • Risk: Complexity of AI/ML solutions might still be a barrier for some SMEs even if cost is reduced.
    • Risk: Data privacy concerns related to the collection and analysis of transaction data for fraud prevention.
    • Risk: Sophistication of fraudsters evolving rapidly, requiring continuous updates to AI models.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • High cost of developing and maintaining advanced AI/ML fraud detection systems.
    • Lack of awareness or technical expertise among SMEs to implement and manage these tools.
    • Data silos hindering the development of comprehensive fraud detection models.
    • Balancing fraud prevention with a frictionless customer experience.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • SaaS-based fraud management platforms with tiered pricing models suitable for SMEs.
    • AI-powered fraud scoring offered as a value-added service by acquirers and payment gateways at minimal additional cost.
    • Collaborative fraud data sharing initiatives (anonymized) among industry players to improve model accuracy.
    • Simplified user interfaces and dashboards for fraud monitoring tools aimed at non-technical users.
    • Government and industry-led initiatives for cybersecurity awareness and education for SMEs.

4. Hyper-Personalized Financial Wellness & Management Tools via Open Finance

  • Demand side signals:

    • Consumers expect unified financial apps combining various services (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Businesses, driven by e-invoicing, seek payment solutions integrated with ERP and accounting (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Desire for insights beyond basic transaction history – predictive planning, automated budgeting (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • The Fintech Law and Open Finance System (OFS) enable AISPs to access and aggregate customer financial data (with consent) (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • AI/ML capabilities can process this data to provide personalized insights and advice (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • Digital wallets are already evolving towards "super-app" models incorporating more financial services (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation (indirectly): Insights from AISPs could influence payment choices or facilitate automated payments for savings/investments.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Wallets become platforms for these value-added services.
    • Infrastructure & Networks: Secure and standardized APIs mandated by OFS are crucial.
    • Regulation & Oversight: CMF's role in supervising AISPs and ensuring data privacy and security under OFS.
    • Disruptiveness: High. Could transform banks and fintechs from mere transaction processors to holistic financial advisors, creating new revenue streams and deepening customer relationships.

  • Ranking: 4 (Strong potential driven by Open Finance, but full realization depends on OFS maturity, consumer trust in data sharing, and development of compelling use cases).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Consumers will grant consent for their financial data to be used by AISPs.
    • Assumption: AISPs can develop AI models that provide genuinely valuable and actionable financial advice.
    • Assumption: Robust data security and privacy measures will be in place and trusted by users.
    • Risk: Slow adoption of Open Finance by consumers due to privacy concerns or lack of perceived value.
    • Risk: Data security breaches in the Open Finance ecosystem could erode trust.
    • Risk: Competition from global tech companies already offering PFM tools.
    • Risk: Regulatory uncertainty or delays in OFS implementation could hinder development.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Building consumer trust for data sharing.
    • Developing sophisticated yet user-friendly AI-driven financial management tools.
    • Ensuring data privacy and security in compliance with regulations.
    • Standardizing data formats and APIs across different financial institutions.
    • Monetizing these services effectively (e.g., subscription, freemium, commission on recommended products).

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • AISP-driven platforms offering predictive cash flow forecasting for SMEs.
    • AI-powered personal finance management (PFM) tools integrated into banking apps and digital wallets.
    • Automated savings and investment tools based on spending patterns and financial goals.
    • Personalized financial literacy content and coaching.
    • Partnerships between banks, fintechs, and other service providers to offer bundled financial wellness packages.

5. Inclusive Digital Onboarding & Financial Literacy Solutions

  • Demand side signals:

    • While Chile has high financial product holding (96% of adults), specific segments like rural populations, the elderly, and migrants remain underserved or face hurdles (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis; IMF eLibrary).
    • Low digital literacy and KYC frictions are key barriers for these groups (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis; Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Gig economy workers may have non-traditional income patterns and documentation needs (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Fintechs like MACH and Tenpo are targeting financial inclusion (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).
    • The Fintech Law promotes financial inclusion as one of its objectives (Dock).
    • Emergence of e-ID initiatives and increasing use of biometrics for authentication could simplify KYC (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • Agent networks (like Servipag) play a role in cash-in/cash-out, indicating potential for assisted digital onboarding (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: Enabling newly included users to make and receive digital payments easily.
    • Authentication & Authorization: Developing inclusive and secure KYC and authentication methods.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Designing user-friendly wallet interfaces and acceptance solutions for low-literacy users or those with basic phones.
    • Regulation & Oversight: Adapting KYC/AML regulations for simplified onboarding for low-risk segments, potentially through regulatory sandboxes.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium. While not overhauling the entire payment system, successful solutions would expand the market significantly and require new approaches to product design and customer support.

  • Ranking: 5 (Significant social and economic need, regulatory support for inclusion, and active efforts by some fintechs, but overcoming deep-seated barriers is challenging).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Regulatory frameworks will allow for simplified KYC for specific low-risk segments without compromising AML/CFT requirements.
    • Assumption: Technology (e.g., biometrics, AI for document verification) can effectively address KYC challenges for diverse populations.
    • Assumption: Digital literacy programs can effectively reach and empower target populations.
    • Risk: Difficulty in reaching and building trust with underserved communities.
    • Risk: Cost of establishing and maintaining physical agent networks for assisted onboarding.
    • Risk: Potential for increased fraud if KYC processes are overly simplified without adequate compensating controls.
    • Risk: Sustainability of business models targeting low-income segments.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Lack of official identification documents for some individuals (especially migrants).
    • Low levels of digital and financial literacy in certain demographics.
    • Limited access to smartphones or reliable internet in remote rural areas.
    • Language barriers.
    • Building trust in digital financial services among populations accustomed to cash.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Digital wallets with ultra-simplified user interfaces, voice assistance, and multi-lingual support.
    • Partnerships with community organizations and NGOs to deliver financial literacy programs.
    • Agent-assisted digital onboarding kiosks in accessible locations.
    • Leveraging e-ID systems and biometric authentication for remote KYC.
    • Developing basic financial products specifically designed for the needs and capabilities of newly included users.

6. Comprehensive Cross-Border E-commerce Enablement for SMEs

  • Demand side signals:

    • SMEs struggle with high FX spreads, complex chargeback processes, and differing compliance regimes when selling internationally (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • Growing e-commerce market (USD 34bn in 2023) includes a desire for SMEs to expand beyond domestic borders (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Regulatory green light for new cross-border acquiring frameworks in Chile (VIXIO Regulatory Intelligence).
    • International PSPs (Worldline, EBANX, APEXX Global) are active in optimizing cross-border payments (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Some acquirers are starting to offer bundled services for e-commerce SMEs (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).
    • Development of local currency wallets with auto-FX capabilities is emerging (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: Allowing international customers to pay with their preferred local methods.
    • Authentication & Authorization: Managing cross-border fraud risks and authentication standards.
    • Processing: Optimizing routing and currency conversion.
    • Clearing & Settlement: Handling multi-currency settlements and reducing delays.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Providing merchants with tools to manage international sales and FX exposure.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium. While cross-border payments exist, a truly comprehensive and SME-friendly solution integrating payments, FX, and compliance support would be a significant enabler.

  • Ranking: 6 (Growing demand from SMEs as e-commerce expands, regulatory support for new frameworks, but complexity of cross-border operations is high).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: SMEs have a genuine and scalable demand for cross-border e-commerce tools.
    • Assumption: Technology can effectively simplify the complexities of international compliance and FX management for SMEs.
    • Assumption: Partnerships with international payment networks and banks can be established to offer competitive rates and reach.
    • Risk: High variability and complexity of international regulations (tax, customs, payments).
    • Risk: Fluctuating FX rates pose significant risk if not managed properly.
    • Risk: Higher fraud risk associated with international transactions.
    • Risk: Competition from established global players offering cross-border solutions.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Navigating diverse international payment preferences, regulations, and tax regimes.
    • Managing currency conversion costs and risks.
    • Dealing with complex and often lengthy cross-border dispute resolution processes.
    • High cost of international shipping and logistics for small businesses.
    • Lack of SME expertise in international trade.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Integrated platforms offering local payment method acceptance in multiple countries.
    • Transparent, real-time FX conversion services with competitive rates.
    • Automated tools for calculating international taxes and duties.
    • Streamlined, API-driven dispute management systems for cross-border transactions.
    • Partnerships with logistics providers to offer integrated shipping solutions.
    • Educational resources and support for SMEs looking to export.

7. Niche and B2B Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) Applications

  • Demand side signals:

    • Strong growth in consumer BNPL (USD 651m in 2024, projected to USD 2.52bn by 2030) indicates appetite for flexible credit (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Demand for credit alternatives beyond traditional cards, especially among younger consumers (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Potential unmet need for short-term financing for SMEs (B2B BNPL for procurement).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Presence of BNPL providers like Wibond (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • The Fintech Law and Open Finance can facilitate alternative credit scoring, making BNPL viable for more segments (Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis).
    • Acquirers and wallets are increasingly looking to integrate BNPL options (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: BNPL offered as a payment option at checkout.
    • Authentication & Authorization: Involves credit risk assessment, potentially using alternative data.
    • Processing: Specific workflows for installment payments and collections.
    • Clearing & Settlement: Managing fund flows between consumer, merchant, BNPL provider, and funding sources.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Merchants integrating BNPL options; wallets embedding BNPL features.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium to High, especially if B2B BNPL gains traction or if BNPL moves into higher-value/essential service categories. It challenges traditional credit card models and short-term lending.

  • Ranking: 7 (Strong consumer BNPL growth shows market receptiveness; B2B and niche consumer BNPL are less developed but have high potential, supported by Open Finance).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Consumer demand for BNPL will extend to specific niches like healthcare or education.
    • Assumption: SMEs are interested in and will adopt BNPL for their procurement needs.
    • Assumption: Alternative data and AI can effectively underwrite these new BNPL segments.
    • Risk: Increased consumer indebtedness if BNPL is not used responsibly.
    • Risk: Regulatory scrutiny and potential new regulations for BNPL providers (CMF preparing rules).
    • Risk: Higher default rates in underserved or B2B segments if risk assessment is inadequate.
    • Risk: Profitability challenges due to competition and the cost of funds.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Developing accurate credit risk models for thin-file consumers or B2B transactions.
    • Managing collections effectively for installment payments.
    • Integrating BNPL seamlessly into various merchant platforms (online and offline).
    • Educating consumers and businesses on responsible BNPL usage.
    • Navigating upcoming CMF regulations for BNPL.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • BNPL for essential services like education fees, medical bills, with tailored repayment plans.
    • B2B BNPL platforms for SMEs to finance inventory or operational expenses.
    • Leveraging Open Finance (AISP) data for more accurate and inclusive credit scoring for BNPL.
    • Partnerships between BNPL providers and specific industry verticals (e.g., travel, electronics).
    • White-label BNPL solutions for banks or larger retailers.

8. Interoperable Digital Wallet Ecosystems

  • Demand side signals:

    • Consumers face friction from multiple proprietary wallet apps (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • A desire for a seamless payment experience where any wallet can be used at any accepting merchant.
    • Rapid growth in wallet adoption (Mercado Pago ~5m users) shows user preference for this form factor (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Currently, wallets often operate in closed-loop or semi-closed-loop systems, though some integrate card payments.
    • The development of a national QR/NFC standard (Whitespace 1) would be a key enabler for wallet interoperability.
    • Fintech Law and Open Finance could encourage greater collaboration and standardization.

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: Users could initiate payments from their preferred wallet regardless of the merchant's specific wallet affiliation.
    • Acceptance & Wallets: Would require wallets to adhere to common standards and potentially connect to a central interoperability layer.
    • Infrastructure & Networks: A shared infrastructure or set of APIs would be needed to route transactions between different wallet systems.
    • Clearing & Settlement: Inter-wallet transfers would need efficient clearing and settlement mechanisms.
    • Disruptiveness: High. Could significantly enhance user convenience and reduce the dominance of individual proprietary wallet ecosystems, fostering a more open market.

  • Ranking: 8 (Strongly linked to the success of Whitespace 1. Demand is clear, but achieving technical and commercial interoperability among competing wallet providers is a major hurdle).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Wallet providers are willing to collaborate and cede some control for the benefit of overall ecosystem growth and user experience.
    • Assumption: A common technical standard for wallet interoperability can be agreed upon and implemented.
    • Risk: Resistance from dominant wallet players who benefit from their current network effects.
    • Risk: Complexity in designing and managing an interoperable system that is secure and efficient.
    • Risk: Ensuring fair cost-sharing and revenue models among participating wallet providers.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Overcoming competitive dynamics between wallet providers.
    • Developing and agreeing on common technical standards for APIs, QR codes, or NFC.
    • Establishing a governance model for the interoperable ecosystem.
    • Ensuring consistent security and user experience across different wallets participating in the system.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • A central "scheme" or "hub" that connects different wallets, similar to card networks.
    • Mandated interoperability standards as part of the Open Finance framework.
    • "Super-app" models that integrate multiple payment sources, including other wallets, through APIs.
    • Focus on use cases where interoperability provides clear value, e.g., P2P transfers between different wallet users.

9. Compliance-as-a-Service for Fintechs

  • Demand side signals:

    • Fintechs, especially early-stage ones, face significant compliance overhead due to new regulations like the Fintech Law (>70 rules) (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Continuous rule updates create planning uncertainty and require dedicated resources (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).
    • Need for simplified paths to regulatory compliance (Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • Emergence of local RegTech companies (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Potential for larger financial institutions or specialized service providers to offer compliance support as a VAS.
    • Regulatory sandboxes might provide a pathway, but day-to-day compliance remains a burden (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Regulation & Oversight: Directly addresses the challenges of adhering to regulatory requirements.
    • All other steps: As compliance cuts across all aspects of payment operations (data security, AML/CFT, consumer protection, operational resilience).
    • Disruptiveness: Medium. Could significantly lower barriers to entry and operational costs for fintechs, fostering more innovation.

  • Ranking: 9 (Clear pain point for a growing fintech sector, driven by new and complex regulations. Offer side is nascent but has potential).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Fintechs are willing to outsource or use third-party tools for critical compliance functions.
    • Assumption: Compliance-as-a-Service providers can stay fully updated with the evolving regulatory landscape.
    • Risk: Reliability and accuracy of third-party compliance services; ultimate responsibility often remains with the fintech.
    • Risk: Data security and confidentiality when sharing sensitive information with compliance service providers.
    • Risk: Cost of such services might still be a barrier for very early-stage startups.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Keeping up with the rapid pace of regulatory changes.
    • Ensuring the quality and reliability of compliance services.
    • Building trust with fintechs to handle sensitive compliance tasks.
    • Tailoring solutions to the diverse needs of different types of fintechs.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • SaaS platforms offering automated compliance checks, reporting tools, and policy templates.
    • Consultancy services specializing in Fintech Law compliance.
    • Industry associations providing shared resources and best practices for compliance.
    • "Regulatory sandbox as a service" offerings that guide fintechs through testing and approval processes.
    • AI-powered tools for regulatory interpretation and change management.

10. PISP-Driven Optimized Checkout Experiences

  • Demand side signals:

    • Merchants seek lower transaction costs (MDRs can be around 2.35% for Transbank, new entrants <2%) and PISPs could offer A2A payments at 30-50 bps (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Consumers desire faster, more seamless checkout experiences, particularly for online and mobile purchases (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).
    • Webpay bank transfers already have significant adoption (74% of A2A e-commerce), indicating user comfort with A2A (Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis).

  • Offer side signals:

    • The Fintech Law (2023) establishes the framework for Payment Initiation Service Providers (PISPs) (Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis).
    • Open Finance System (OFS) aims for full API deployment by 2027, which is critical for PISP functionality (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).
    • Companies like Khipu are already operating in the A2A space and are positioned to leverage PISP licenses (Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile).

  • Affected steps of the value chain:

    • Payment Initiation: PISPs directly initiate payments from the payer's bank account to the merchant's account.
    • Authentication & Authorization: Relies on bank-level authentication (SCA) facilitated by the PISP.
    • Processing: Bypasses traditional card processing rails for A2A transactions.
    • Clearing & Settlement: Utilizes interbank transfer systems, potentially real-time rails.
    • Disruptiveness: Very High. Directly challenges the card-centric payment model by offering a potentially cheaper and faster alternative for merchants and a streamlined experience for consumers.

  • Ranking: Undetermined (High potential but heavily dependent on the pace and effectiveness of OFS implementation, bank API readiness, and consumer/merchant adoption of PISP services. Ranked lower for now due to this dependency, but strength of signals is high for the future).

  • Key assumptions and risks:

    • Assumption: Banks will provide robust, reliable, and standardized APIs for PISPs as per OFS mandates.
    • Assumption: Consumers will trust PISPs to initiate payments from their bank accounts securely.
    • Assumption: Merchants will see a clear cost and efficiency benefit to integrate PISP solutions.
    • Risk: Delays or challenges in the implementation of the Open Finance System and bank API readiness.
    • Risk: Cybersecurity concerns related to PISP access to bank accounts.
    • Risk: User experience friction if bank authentication processes via PISPs are cumbersome.
    • Risk: Competition from established payment methods and potential resistance from banks if PISP adoption significantly erodes their card-related revenues.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Ensuring widespread bank participation and high-quality API development for the OFS.
    • Building consumer trust and awareness of PISP services.
    • Developing compelling and user-friendly PISP checkout solutions.
    • Establishing clear liability frameworks in case of fraudulent or erroneous PISP transactions.
    • Potential for fragmentation if multiple PISPs offer incompatible solutions before standards fully mature.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • PISPs offering one-click A2A payments embedded in e-commerce checkouts and mobile apps.
    • QR code-based A2A payments at POS initiated via PISPs.
    • PISP services integrated into merchant platforms and ERP systems for B2B payments.
    • Value-added services bundled with PISP payments, such as instant payment confirmation and simplified reconciliation.
    • Strong security measures, including consent management and SCA, as mandated by OFS.

References

  • APEXX Global. Payment Gateway Chile. https://apexx.global/payment-gateways/latam/chile/
  • Banco Central de Chile. Payment systems. https://www.bcentral.cl/web/bch/areas-de-accion/mercado-financiero/sistemas-de-pago
  • Banco Central de Chile. BOX III.1 – Setting Final Limits to Card’s Interchange Fees. https://www.bcentral.cl/documents/33528/1333266/IEF_II_2023_BOX_III_1.pdf
  • CMF Chile. Regulations on Financial Services Providers in the Fintech Act. https://www.cmfchile.cl/portal/principal/605/w3-article-85488.html
  • Dock. Ley Fintech in Chile: A promising scenario for the industry and growth towards financial inclusion. https://www.dock.tech/blog/ley-fintech-chile/
  • Finnovista. What You Need to Know About Chile's Fast-Maturing Fintech Market. https://blog.finnovista.com/en/what-you-need-to-know-about-chiles-fast-maturing-fintech-market
  • GlobeNewswire. Chile Buy Now Pay Later Business Databook 2025. https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2024/03/05/2839801/0/en/Chile-Buy-Now-Pay-Later-Business-Databook-2025-A-651-Million-Market-in-2024-Expected-to-Reach-871-Million-in-2025-Signaling-Robust-Growth.html
  • IMF eLibrary. Fintech and Financial Inclusion in Chile. https://www.imf.org/en/Publications/CR/Issues/2024/02/05/Fintech-and-Financial-Inclusion-in-Chile-in-544502
  • Khipu – Open Finance APIs. https://khipu.com/en/
  • PCMI. Chile 2024: Digital Payments and Ecommerce Insights. https://paymentscardsandmobile.com/chile-2024-digital-payments-and-ecommerce-insights/
  • VIXIO Regulatory Intelligence. Chile Gives Green Light to Cross-Border Card Acquiring. https://vixio.com/news/payments/chile-gives-green-light-to-cross-border-card-acquiring
  • World Bank. Case Study: Chile – Fast Payments Toolkit. https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/2d52795c371322b0682303079c79344b-0320022021/original/Chile-Fast-Payments-Toolkit-Case-Study.pdf
  • Value Chain Report on the Payment Industry in Chile (Provided Knowledge)
  • Payment in Chile Current and Future Opportunities Analysis (Provided Knowledge)
  • Payment in Chile Ongoing Changes Signals Analysis (Provided Knowledge)
  • Payment in Chile Current Pains Analysis (Provided Knowledge)
  • Payment in Chile Consumption Trends Analysis (Provided Knowledge)
  • Payment in Chile Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis (Provided Knowledge)