Skip to content

Chemicals in Mexico Potential Whitespaces Qualification

Whitespaces Qualification

Here is a qualified list of whitespaces, detailing demand and offer signals, value chain impact, ranking, assumptions, risks, challenges, and potential solutions.

1. Bio-based and Biodegradable Performance Chemicals

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • Increasing pressure from global OEMs (e.g., automotive sector mandating 25% recycled/sustainable content by 2027 under USMCA regional rules) and consumer brands for traceable, low-carbon, and circular raw materials (Idesa Petroquímica, 2024; Current Pains Document).
    • Growing consumer preference for sustainable products, influencing purchasing decisions in sectors like packaging, personal care, and agriculture.
    • ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) considerations are becoming pivotal in procurement criteria, with early adopters poised to capture premium niches (Consumption Trends Document).
    • Demand for low-VOC solvents and bio-based polymers is explicitly mentioned as an unmet need (Current Pains Document).
    • Mexican agrochemical market growth (Mordor Intelligence, cited in Value Chain Report) suggests opportunities for bio-pesticides and sustainable agricultural inputs.

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Limited local production of advanced bio-based feedstocks (e.g., from agricultural biomass) and derived specialty bio-chemicals at a commercial scale. Offerings are often imported or in nascent stages (Opportunities Analysis Document).
    • Early-stage move by some players towards bio-based feedstocks like vegetable oils and sugar-derived ethanol, and development of "green" product lines (e.g., low-VOC coatings, fluoride-free refrigerants) (Consumption Trends Document).
    • Emergence of startups in Mexico focused on bioplastics (e.g., Biointellectus, cited in Ongoing Changes Signals document), indicating budding innovation but not yet scaled supply.
    • Low domestic R&D spend in the chemical sector (~0.6% of sales vs. >3% in leading hubs) hinders rapid development of local bio-based chemical solutions (Current Pains Document).

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • Raw Material Supply: High disruption. Shift from fossil-fuel feedstocks to agricultural biomass, algae, or waste streams. Requires new sourcing, logistics, and pre-processing infrastructure. Players like Pemex (traditional) vs. new bio-feedstock aggregators and processors.
    • Basic Chemical Production: Medium to High disruption. Development of biorefineries producing platform bio-chemicals (e.g., bio-ethanol, bio-ethylene, succinic acid). Requires new catalytic processes and potentially smaller, decentralized plants. Players like Alpek, Idesa might explore bio-routes.
    • Specialty Chemical Production: High disruption. Formulation of new bio-based polymers, bio-surfactants, bio-solvents, bio-pesticides. Requires significant R&D and application development. Players like Stepan, UPL, Bayer would be affected or could lead.
    • Formulation & Compounding: Medium disruption. Incorporation of bio-based ingredients into existing or new product lines (paints, adhesives, cosmetics). Requires reformulation and testing.
    • End-Use Industries: Medium disruption. Adoption of new materials, potentially requiring adjustments in manufacturing processes and product design. Automotive, packaging, agriculture, consumer goods sectors will be key adopters.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 1 (Strongest)

    • Rationale: Strong convergence of regulatory push (USMCA), global OEM mandates, explicit unmet needs for ESG-compliant products, and observable early-stage offer-side movements (startups, initial green lines). The economic potential of sustainable alternatives is globally recognized.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • Continued and strengthening regulatory pressure for sustainable content and carbon footprint reduction.
      • Consumer demand for green products will translate into willingness to pay potential premiums, at least initially.
      • Technology for producing bio-based chemicals at scale and competitive cost will mature and become accessible.
      • Availability of sustainable biomass feedstock in Mexico without negatively impacting food security or biodiversity.
    • Risks:
      • Cost Competitiveness: Bio-based alternatives may initially be more expensive than fossil-based counterparts.
      • Performance Parity: Ensuring bio-based chemicals meet or exceed the performance standards of existing products.
      • Scalability: Scaling up production from lab/pilot to commercial volumes can be challenging and capital-intensive.
      • Feedstock Variability: Consistency and availability of biomass feedstocks can be affected by agricultural cycles and climate.
      • Greenwashing Accusations: Need for robust certification and lifecycle analysis to substantiate sustainability claims.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • High capital investment for biorefineries and new production technologies.
    • Need for developing local, resilient supply chains for agricultural biomass.
    • Limited R&D infrastructure and funding for bio-based chemical innovation in Mexico.
    • Competition from established global players with advanced bio-chemical portfolios.
    • Lack of comprehensive national strategy or incentives specifically for bio-economy development in the chemical sector.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Establishing integrated biorefineries using diverse local feedstocks (e.g., agave bagasse, corn stover, algae).
    • Public-private partnerships to fund R&D in bio-conversion technologies and pilot plants.
    • Development of "drop-in" bio-based chemicals that can directly replace conventional ones without major process changes for end-users.
    • Creation of industry consortia to develop standards and certifications for bio-based products in Mexico.
    • Incentivizing farmers to cultivate dedicated non-food energy crops or utilize agricultural residues for industrial purposes.

2. Advanced Chemical Recycling Infrastructure and Feedstock Production

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • Automotive OEMs mandating 25% recycled content in plastics by 2027 under USMCA regional rules (Idesa Petroquímica, 2024; Current Pains Document).
    • Consumer goods companies and retailers facing public pressure and setting internal targets for increased recycled content in packaging.
    • Desire to create a circular economy for plastics and reduce landfilling, driven by environmental concerns and potential future regulations.
    • Need for high-quality recycled feedstocks that can substitute virgin materials without compromising performance.

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Nascent chemical recycling infrastructure in Mexico; most current plastic recycling is mechanical and often results in downcycled materials (Opportunities Analysis Document).
    • Limited capacity to handle complex, multi-layer, or contaminated plastic waste streams which are ideal candidates for chemical recycling.
    • Emergence of startups globally and a few locally (e.g., Ecoloop for plastics recycling, cited in Ongoing Changes Signals document) exploring advanced recycling technologies, but not yet at industrial scale in Mexico.
    • Petrochemical companies (e.g., Alpek, Braskem-Idesa) are exploring circular economy initiatives globally, which could extend to their Mexican operations.

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • Raw Material Supply: High disruption. Creates a new, local source of chemical feedstocks (e.g., pyrolysis oil, monomers) derived from plastic waste. This competes with and complements virgin fossil feedstocks. Involves new players in waste collection, sorting, and pre-processing.
    • Basic Chemical Production: High disruption. Integration of recycled feedstocks into existing production units (e.g., crackers). Requires adaptation of purification and processing steps. Potential for smaller, decentralized chemical recycling units located near waste sources.
    • Distribution & Commercialization (of waste): Emergence of a new value chain for collecting, sorting, and supplying plastic waste as feedstock to chemical recyclers.
    • End-Use Industries: Medium disruption. Enables meeting recycled content mandates. May require validation of materials produced from chemically recycled feedstocks.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 2

    • Rationale: Strong regulatory drivers (USMCA), clear mandates from key end-use industries (automotive), and a visible gap in current recycling capabilities. The "circular economy" is a globally dominant theme.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • Regulatory mandates for recycled content will be enforced and potentially expanded.
      • Chemical recycling technologies will prove economically viable and scalable in the Mexican context.
      • Sufficient quantities of suitable plastic waste can be consistently collected and sorted.
      • Products made from chemically recycled feedstocks will achieve market acceptance and performance parity.
    • Risks:
      • Technology Risk: Some chemical recycling technologies are still maturing and face challenges in terms of efficiency, energy consumption, and output quality.
      • Feedstock Availability & Quality: Securing a consistent supply of appropriately sorted plastic waste at a viable cost. Contamination can be a major issue.
      • Economic Viability: High capital and operational costs compared to virgin plastic production, especially if oil prices are low.
      • Regulatory Uncertainty: Evolving regulations around chemical recycling definitions, waste management, and product standards.
      • Public Perception: Ensuring transparency and addressing concerns about environmental impact of chemical recycling processes themselves.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • High capital investment for chemical recycling plants.
    • Lack of established infrastructure for large-scale collection, segregation, and pre-treatment of plastic waste suitable for chemical recycling.
    • Fragmented waste management sector in Mexico.
    • Need for clear regulatory frameworks that support chemical recycling and define its outputs (e.g., as non-waste).
    • Competition from mechanical recycling for cleaner waste streams.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Investing in various chemical recycling technologies like pyrolysis, gasification, and depolymerization, tailored to specific plastic types.
    • Partnerships between chemical companies, waste management firms, and municipalities to secure feedstock.
    • Development of "mass balance" accounting systems to track and certify recycled content in final products.
    • Government incentives or Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) schemes that funnel investment into advanced recycling.
    • Modular chemical recycling plants that can be deployed closer to sources of plastic waste.

3. Localized Specialty Chemical Formulation and Application Development Services for SMEs

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • 60% of specialty chemicals are imported due to a lack of local equivalents, indicating a strong need for local development (Publications IADB, 2023; Current Pains Document).
    • SMEs require rapid co-development of region-specific formulations (e.g., agrochemicals for Mexican climates, food-grade additives aligned to NOM standards) but often lack in-house R&D (Current Pains Document).
    • End-users rely on imported formulations and foreign technical centers, leading to longer development cycles and potential IP concerns (Current Pains Document).
    • Distributors are increasingly bundling technical advisory and formulation lab services, signaling demand (Consumption Trends Document, Brenntag, Univar).

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Low domestic R&D spend (<1% of sales) curtails the pipeline of new local specialty chemistries (Current Pains Document; Ongoing Changes Signals).
    • Weak academia-industry links slow down application development (Current Pains Document).
    • Few public-private labs dedicated to chemical application development (Current Pains Document).
    • Major distributors are starting to offer formulation labs (Brenntag México, Univar Solutions) but coverage and depth for diverse SME needs might be limited.

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • Specialty Chemical Production: Medium disruption. Shift from importing finished specialties to importing active ingredients and formulating locally, or developing unique local formulations. Encourages smaller, agile producers or specialized arms of larger companies.
    • Formulation & Compounding: High disruption. This is the core of the whitespace. Creation of new entities or expansion of existing formulators focused on SME needs.
    • Distribution & Commercialization: Medium to High disruption. Distributors can become key enablers by hosting or partnering with these application centers, transforming from pure sellers to solution providers.
    • End-Use Industries (SMEs): Low disruption for them, high benefit. SMEs gain access to tailored solutions, faster problem-solving, and potentially lower costs or better-performing products.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 3

    • Rationale: Very clear evidence of high import dependency for specialties, direct pain points expressed by SMEs regarding lack of local R&D and support, and initial moves by distributors to fill this gap. The economic impact of import substitution and value addition is significant.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • SMEs are willing to collaborate and share information for customized formulation development.
      • Local talent (chemists, formulation scientists, application engineers) can be developed or attracted.
      • Investment in lab equipment and pilot facilities will yield commercially viable solutions.
      • IP generated can be adequately protected.
    • Risks:
      • Scalability of Service: Providing in-depth, customized support to a large and diverse SME base can be resource-intensive.
      • Commercial Viability: Ensuring that the cost of providing these specialized services can be recovered through product sales or service fees.
      • Talent Acquisition and Retention: Finding and keeping skilled formulation chemists and technical experts.
      • Keeping Pace with Global Innovation: Local centers need to stay updated with global technological advancements.
      • IP Protection: SMEs might be hesitant to share sensitive product information.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Initial investment in laboratory equipment, pilot-scale facilities, and skilled personnel.
    • Bridging the gap between academic research and commercially viable SME solutions.
    • Building trust with SMEs to engage in co-development.
    • Fragmented SME market, making it hard to achieve economies of scale in service provision.
    • Competition from established multinational specialty chemical suppliers who offer global solutions.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Creation of regional technical application centers, potentially as public-private partnerships or joint ventures between distributors, chemical producers, and universities (leveraging clusters in Nuevo León, Estado de México, Guanajuato).
    • Mobile laboratories or "pop-up" application clinics to reach SMEs in different industrial zones.
    • Online platforms for formulation requests, knowledge sharing (e.g., formulation libraries for common problems), and remote technical support.
    • Focus on adapting global technologies to local/regional raw materials and specific Mexican market needs (e.g., climate-specific agrochemicals, food additives meeting NOM standards).
    • Development of modular training programs for SMEs on chemical application and basic formulation.

4. Integrated Digital Compliance and Supply Chain Transparency Solutions for Regulated Chemicals

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • SMEs spend ~6% of turnover on compliance administration due to fragmented, overlapping rules from SEMARNAT, COFEPRIS, SCT, and customs (DRIM International, 2023; Current Pains Document).
    • Unclear, shifting criteria at borders cause delays and fines (Current Pains Document).
    • Growing need for traceability for quality control (pharma, food), ESG audits, and risk of counterfeit chemicals (Consumption Trends Document).
    • Anticipation of more stringent regulations like LGGISQ and ReNaSQ (Ongoing Changes Signals document).
    • 70% of SMEs still rely on phone/email for ordering, indicating low digitalization and potential for errors in handling regulated goods information (Guía de la Industria Química, 2024; Current Pains Document).

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Fragmented solutions currently exist; no dominant "one-stop-shop" digital platform for chemical compliance in Mexico.
    • Distributors are beginning to provide digital SDS libraries and some compliance support, but comprehensive, integrated digital tools are not widespread (Consumption Trends Document).
    • Startups globally are developing RegTech solutions, but localization for Mexican regulations is key.
    • Adoption of AI and digital technologies in Mexican manufacturing is rising, indicating readiness for such solutions (Ongoing Changes Signals Document).

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • All value chain steps: High impact on operational efficiency and risk management.
      • Raw Material Supply, Basic & Specialty Production: Managing import/export compliance, internal safety documentation, environmental reporting.
      • Formulation & Compounding: Ensuring formulations meet all regulatory requirements, managing SDS for new mixtures.
      • Distribution & Commercialization: Crucial for managing transport regulations (SCT), customs, providing customers with correct documentation (SDS, COA), and product stewardship. This is a key area for value-added services.
      • End-Use Industries: Managing safe handling, storage, disposal, and workplace safety compliance related to chemicals used.
    • Disruptiveness: Medium to High. Can significantly reduce administrative burden, improve safety, and ensure market access, but requires adoption of new digital tools and processes.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 4

    • Rationale: Clear financial pain point for SMEs (compliance costs), increasing regulatory complexity, and the global trend towards digitalization for transparency and efficiency. The anticipation of new, stricter regulations (LGGISQ, ReNaSQ) strengthens this signal.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • Regulatory bodies (SEMARNAT, COFEPRIS, etc.) will support or at least not hinder the use of digital platforms for compliance.
      • SMEs will be willing to invest in and adopt digital compliance tools if they offer clear ROI.
      • Data security and confidentiality can be assured on these platforms.
      • Integration with existing SME business systems (even if basic) is feasible.
    • Risks:
      • Keeping Pace with Regulatory Changes: The platform must be continuously updated as regulations evolve.
      • Data Accuracy and Liability: Ensuring the information provided by the platform is accurate and who bears liability for errors.
      • User Adoption: Overcoming resistance to change and ensuring SMEs have the digital literacy to use the tools.
      • Interoperability: Integrating with various government portals and diverse company systems.
      • Cybersecurity: Protecting sensitive compliance and supply chain data.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Complexity and frequent changes in Mexican chemical regulations.
    • Low levels of digitalization among many SMEs.
    • Cost of developing and maintaining a comprehensive, up-to-date compliance platform.
    • Ensuring data privacy and security.
    • Fragmented nature of current IT solutions for different aspects of compliance.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Developing SaaS platforms that integrate:
      • Regulatory databases (updated lists of controlled substances, NOMs, etc.).
      • Automated SDS generation/management in Spanish, compliant with Mexican NOMs.
      • Permit and license tracking and renewal reminders.
      • Transport documentation generation.
      • Chemical inventory tracking with regulatory flags.
      • Audit preparation tools.
      • Blockchain or similar technologies for secure and immutable traceability of chemical batches.
    • Partnerships between tech companies, industry associations (like ANIQ), and distributors to develop and promote such tools.
    • Offering tiered services, with basic compliance information available at low cost or free, and premium features for a subscription.

5. "Chemicals-as-a-Service" Models for High-Value, Low-Volume Applications

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • Certain industries (e.g., electronics, aerospace, specialized medical device manufacturing, advanced R&D labs) require high-purity or performance-critical chemicals in small, often irregular quantities.
    • Managing inventory for such low-volume, high-cost chemicals is inefficient and ties up capital for these users.
    • These users prioritize performance, reliability of supply, and minimized handling risks over outright ownership of the chemical.
    • Need for flexible ordering and packaging for smaller quantities (Consumption Trends Document).

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Traditional chemical sales models are overwhelmingly volume-based.
    • Limited offerings for highly flexible, on-demand supply coupled with integrated lifecycle management (delivery, quality assurance at point of use, handling, recovery/disposal) for small batches.
    • Distributors are investing in repackaging lines for smaller formats (Consumption Trends Document), which is a step in this direction but not a full service model.
    • The concept of "servitization" is growing in other B2B industries.

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • Specialty Chemical Production: Low direct disruption to production, but requires a new commercial model and potentially new packaging/delivery systems for small, high-purity batches.
    • Distribution & Commercialization: High disruption. This is where the model would likely be implemented by specialized distributors or even directly by some niche specialty producers. It requires a shift from transactional sales to ongoing service provision and performance management.
    • End-Use Industries: Low disruption, high benefit. Simplifies procurement, reduces inventory holding, ensures quality, and potentially outsources some handling/waste management risks.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 5

    • Rationale: This is a more niche and emerging opportunity. While signals for flexible packaging and SME needs exist, the full "as-a-Service" model is less explicitly demanded in current documents but aligns with global trends in other industries and addresses implicit needs of high-tech sectors.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • Target customers (high-tech, R&D) are willing to pay a premium for the convenience, risk reduction, and performance assurance of a service model.
      • The value of the chemical and the cost of mismanagement (e.g., contamination, obsolescence) are high enough to justify a service fee.
      • Logistics for small, precise deliveries can be managed efficiently.
      • Technology for remote monitoring of chemical usage or condition (if part of the model) is feasible.
    • Risks:
      • Profitability at Low Volumes: Structuring service fees to ensure profitability when dealing with small quantities.
      • Complexity of Service Delivery: Managing numerous small, customized service agreements can be operationally complex.
      • Liability: Clearly defining responsibilities for chemical performance, handling, and disposal under a service model.
      • Customer Lock-in vs. Flexibility: Balancing the desire for long-term service relationships with customer needs for flexibility.
      • Market Size: Accurately assessing the size of the addressable market for such a specialized service in Mexico.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • Shifting the mindset from selling products to selling services/outcomes.
    • Developing accurate cost models for service provision.
    • Logistical challenges of managing frequent, small-volume deliveries of potentially hazardous materials.
    • Establishing the infrastructure for chemical recovery, recycling, or responsible disposal as part of the service.
    • Educating the market about the benefits of such a model.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Subscription-based models where customers pay for access to a portfolio of chemicals and associated services.
    • Pay-per-use models, potentially enabled by IoT sensors on chemical containers or dispensing equipment.
    • Suppliers or specialized distributors managing on-site chemical cabinets or small-scale inventories for clients.
    • Integrated services including automated reordering, quality monitoring, safety training for handling, and end-of-life management.
    • Focus on chemicals where purity, stability, or precise dosing are critical (e.g., electronic-grade solvents, reagents for biotech, calibration standards).

6. Advanced Water Treatment Solutions and Services for Industrial Reuse and Scarcity Mitigation

  • Demand Side Signals:

    • Increasing water scarcity in many industrial regions of Mexico is a well-documented problem, driving industries to seek solutions for water reuse and conservation.
    • Stricter wastewater discharge regulations (from SEMARNAT, CONAGUA) are compelling industries to improve their treatment processes.
    • Growing industrial activity, particularly with nearshoring, increases overall water demand and wastewater generation.
    • Need for cost-effective and efficient water treatment chemicals and technologies to enable reuse.

  • Offer Side Signals:

    • Basic water treatment chemicals (coagulants, flocculants, disinfectants) are available from various local and international suppliers (e.g., Aldar Química, AQUA MONT listed in Value Chain Report's player examples).
    • A gap exists in the provision of advanced, integrated solutions that combine specialized chemicals (e.g., for membrane treatments, advanced oxidation processes - AOPs) with process optimization services, remote monitoring, and potentially full operational management.
    • Some specialty chemical companies globally offer advanced water treatment portfolios, but local application expertise and integrated service models might be less developed in Mexico.

  • Affected Steps of the Value Chain and Disruptiveness:

    • Specialty Chemical Production: Medium disruption. Opportunity to develop and supply higher-value, specialized water treatment chemicals (e.g., reverse osmosis antiscalants, membrane cleaners, AOP catalysts, ion exchange resins).
    • Formulation & Compounding: Medium disruption. Custom blending of treatment chemicals based on specific water quality and industrial effluent characteristics.
    • Distribution & Commercialization: High disruption. Shift from just selling chemicals to providing comprehensive water management solutions, including technical services, equipment, and potentially operational contracts.
    • End-Use Industries: Medium disruption. Adoption of more advanced water treatment systems and processes, potentially outsourcing water management to specialized service providers.

  • Ranking (Strength of Market Signals): 6

    • Rationale: Water scarcity is a fundamental and growing challenge in Mexico. Regulatory pressures for better wastewater management are increasing. While basic chemicals are available, the need for more sophisticated, holistic solutions addressing reuse and advanced treatment is a clear gap.

  • Key Assumptions and Risks:

    • Assumptions:
      • The cost of fresh water and/or penalties for non-compliant discharge will continue to rise, making investments in advanced treatment and reuse economically attractive.
      • Industries are willing to invest in more advanced water treatment technologies and potentially outsource operations.
      • Reliable technologies for advanced water treatment are available and can be adapted to Mexican industrial conditions.
    • Risks:
      • High Capital Costs: Advanced water treatment systems can be expensive to install.
      • Operational Complexity: Some advanced systems require skilled operators and careful maintenance.
      • Variability of Industrial Effluents: Tailoring solutions to diverse and fluctuating wastewater streams can be challenging.
      • Return on Investment: Convincing industries of the long-term ROI, especially if initial capital outlay is significant.
      • Competition: Competition from established water technology companies (equipment providers) and engineering firms.

  • Challenges and Barriers:

    • High upfront investment costs for advanced water treatment infrastructure.
    • Lack of specialized local expertise in designing, implementing, and operating advanced water treatment systems.
    • Reluctance of some industries to adopt new technologies or change established water management practices.
    • Need for tailored chemical solutions for diverse industrial wastewaters.
    • Financing challenges for SMEs to invest in advanced water treatment.

  • Potential Solutions and Innovations:

    • Providing comprehensive water management solutions that combine:
      • Supply of specialized and formulated water treatment chemicals.
      • Process engineering expertise for system design and optimization.
      • IoT-based remote monitoring and control systems for real-time performance management.
      • Mobile treatment units for temporary needs or smaller sites.
    • Build-Own-Operate (BOO) or Build-Own-Operate-Transfer (BOOT) models for industrial water treatment facilities, reducing upfront capital expenditure for clients.
    • Leasing models for advanced treatment equipment.
    • Focus on specific industries with high water consumption and challenging effluents (e.g., food & beverage, textiles, mining, petrochemicals).
    • Development of AI-powered predictive analytics for optimizing chemical dosage and predicting maintenance needs in water treatment plants.

References

  • ANIQ. PANORAMA NACIONAL DE LA INDUSTRIA QUÍMICA. 06 May 2024. https://www.aniq.org.mx/Home/Noticia/138
  • ANIQ. Anuario Estadístico de la Industria Química – Comercio Exterior. https://www.aniq.org.mx/Home/Anuario/10
  • Brenntag. Distribución de productos químicos en México. https://www.brenntag.com/en-mx/
  • DRIM International. Panorama Nacional de la Industria Química. https://driminternational.com/panorama-nacional-de-la-industria-quimica/
  • Guía de la Industria Química. Análisis de la Industria Química en México. https://www.industriaquimica.mx/analisis-industria-quimica-mexico
  • Idesa Petroquímica - Inicio. https://www.idesa.com.mx/petroquimica (Referenced via USMCA content rules).
  • Inegi. La industria química. Censos Económicos 2019. 2021.
  • MBA3. Industria Química: Año de Retos. https://mba3.com/industria-quimica-ano-de-retos/
  • Milenio. Industria química perfila duplicar su tamaño: Camexa. 26 Nov 2024. https://www.milenio.com/negocios/industria-quimica-perfila-duplicar-tamano-camexa
  • Mordor Intelligence. Mexico Agrochemicals Market Report. https://www.mordorintelligence.com/es/industry-reports/mexico-agrochemicals-market
  • Publications IADB. La cadena de valor de productos químicos en México. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/сию/La-cadena-de-valor-de-productos-quimicos-en-Mexico.pdf
  • Tecnotanques. La industria química, base de la reactivación económica en México 2021. 11 Jan 2021. https://www.tecnotanques.com/blog/industria-quimica-base-de-la-reactivacion-economica-en-mexico-2021/
  • Value Chain Report on the Chemicals Industry in Mexico (Provided in the prompt).
  • Chemicals in Mexico Current and Future Opportunities Analysis (Provided in the prompt).
  • Chemicals in Mexico Ongoing Changes Signals Analysis (Provided in the prompt).
  • Chemicals in Mexico Current Pains Analysis (Provided in the prompt).
  • Chemicals in Mexico Consumption Trends Analysis (Provided in the prompt).
  • Chemicals in Mexico Niche and Emerging Markets Analysis (Provided in the prompt).